by Sharon Broussard
Black women have been prominent in the labor force since the days of slavery, when many were forced to work in fields alongside their men. After slavery, black working women labored as domestics to help support their families. The only other fields open to black women were traditional female professions such as nursing, teaching, and social work.
However, in the late 60's, educated black women began to move into white male dominated professions such as law, business, and medicine, mainly as a result of Affirmative Action programs. This phenomenon has sent many researchers and scholars alike scrambling for data to determine the implications of such sudden career mobility.
Dr. Robert Staples, an associate professor in sociology at San Francisico State and author of "The World of Black Singles: The Changing Patters of Male-Female Relations", is one such scholar. And his conclusions have made him a controversial figure in the black community.
In a lecture last month on the careers and professional relationships of black professional women, given at the four-day-long Black Working Women's Conference sponsored byt the Women's Center here, Staples said that black women are twice as likely as black men to graduate from college and continue their education on the graduate level.
"Black women are in the ascendancy, " he told an audience of approximately 50 people, mostly women, gathered in the Women's Center Lounge. "Womend o better in schools. Men get trapped in the manhood hustle--they believe they'll be basketball stars."
These women are often rewarded with lucrative careers, continued Staples, but they pay a high personal price if they are searching for black marriage partners with similar educational backgrounds and career opportunities. "That's where the rub comes in. There's a numbers problem," said Staples, as he shuffled his yellow legal-sized notes in front of him.
For example, Staples points out there were 150,000 more black women than black men enrolled in college in 1979. In contrast about one million more white males than females were enrolled in college, he said. Unless black women consider "marrying down," marrying working-class men with little education, they may find themselves opthing for alternative relationships ranging from singlehood to lesbianism, concluded Staples.
Staples' lecture was met with hostility and indignation by his audience who accused him of ignoring the general economic status of black women. And rightly so. Only a minority of black women enjoy the material success that Staples described. Economist Julianne Malveaux, an assistant professor at the New School for Social Research in New York, castigated Staples for neglecting to discuss the under-employment and unemployment of black women.
In a later lecture at the conference, Malveaux said that approximately 60% of working black women are in traditional low-paying female clerical and service jobs. "Occupationally, the polsiiton of black women has been worse than other groups." she said.
But few women in the audience objected to Staples's contention that black women outnumber black males in college and higher income professions, although the accuracy of Staples's views would affirm the matriarchy myth, the idea that black women dominate their males in the home and job market. They know that in appearances, at least, black women have made gigantic strides in the marketplace, seemingly moving by leaps and bounds out o fthe white man's kitchen and into elite schools and professions once closed to all blacks, such as law, business, and engineering. But in their wake, more myths have sprung up about black women.
One such myth is that black women are eagerly sought after by employers because they satisfy both race and sex Affirmative Action quotas. However, in acutality, black women are usually counted in one category--race. And despite Affirmative Action gains accrued by a few women, black women with education are less less likely than uneducated or black males to earn more than $20,000.
In addition to these myths, however, there are very real problems of black professional women who are single and complaining. Many o fthem have been groomed by parents for middle-class lifestyle. They have been urged since grade school to excel academically and to forego marriage until after they begin their careers. When school finally ends, they begin to consider marriage--to those who reflect their upbringing and values. Many of them are quickly convinced that single black professional men are practically non-existent.
And that belief is not far from the truth because the middle-class itself is a fragile institution maintained by two working marriage partners and heavily dependent on government employment. According to Malveaux, approximately 40% of the black middlecalass hold government jobs, jobs which may be endangered by government cutbacks.
Yet the success of the new black professional class is the bright side of an otherwise gloomy economic picture for other blacks. The economic gap is widening between whites and blacks. More importantly, high unemployment among black males and teenagers coupled with a tremendous growth in poor female-headed households may mean the perpetuation of a vicious cycle of poverty for the majority of blacks.
A closer look at the problems of professional black women exposes the inner tension of black relationships between the sexes regardless of class due to economic conditions. Both lower-class black women who are living alone and middle-class black women who are unable to establish relationships with those who are their peers have the same "male problem". They both lack mates because uneducated and unskilled black men--of which there are many--oftend on't overcome the effects of job discrimination, poverty, and educational inequality. A disproportionate number of black men are in jaiil, on drugs, or die at an early age.
On college campuses, the "male problem" is an important topic among black women, but it is discussed as though it has no relation to the economic position of black people in this country. C. Dianne Howell, a counseling psychiatrist at Cal, said that the lack of single black men is frequently a discussion topic here. "There's a concern about how to develop meaningful relationships with someone they can respect," said Howell.
Some of these women are looking elsewhere for eligible mates, she said, and considering anew interracial dating, sharing eligible men with other women, and marrying outside of their class.
But choosing alternative relationships is no solution to the economic problems which plague the black community. There is a far deadlier numbers game being played than the scarcity of professional black men and it is reflected in the dire statistics on the widespread poverty of black communities. Until the majority of black males and females have equal educational and career opportunities, then black professional women will continue to trade careers for sound relationships and remain a class apart.
Saturday, September 12, 1981
Chinese Baseball: A Racist's Game
by Bill NG
"Have you ever heard of Chinese baseball?" American baseball perhaps. But, Chinese baseball? That question was raised by an instructor in a seminar. As a Chinese-American, I had never heard of it. No one else in the class had either. The name of the game apparently originated in Chicago where there are very few Chinese-Americans. The instructor, who is from Chicago, shared this story as an illustration on how to cope with staff communication problems. The gist of the story is that in the baseball game itself, after the white ball is thrown by the pitcher, anyone can kick the bases. That, he said, is the best way to win. The story upset me sufficiently that I could not understand the point. It supposedly illustrated communication. It supposedly was the best way to win; somehow, nobody, therefore, loses in the game.
I was upset because it sounded as if in the game, at the point where everyone kicks bases, there would result all mannter of confusion. Kicking the bases made it seem that Chinese people were people kicked about. Why else call it "Chinese baseball"?
I confronted the instructor during the class break and inquired as to the origin of the phrase. He did not know where or when the term had come into existence, but he did know that it was a game which had been played in the Chicago area for several generations. I told him that I was Chinese and that his statements had insulted me. The instructor asked me not to "take it personally." Probably his ancestors had problems with Chinese people and the naming of the game had racist origins. Having expressed my concern and having been reassured, I still did not feel very goodabout the way it had been done. Still, I assumed that the phrase would not be repeated. To my amazement, the instructor then closed teh seminar by re-using the illustration. I again approached him. And again he was apologetic and said he would have to find another name for it. Will he?
It is clear to me that members of the dominant society often are not sensitive to and remain unconcerned about minorities. They have no sense of the history of ethnic groups in this country. They will not take seriously the comments and feelings of minorities, even when they are specifically todle that their actions are offensive. Do we have to be dramic forever to insure that our point of view and our feelings are taken seriously? Do I have to "knock" the instructor over the head with a bat? Apparently so, for racisim is alive and swinging.
"Have you ever heard of Chinese baseball?" American baseball perhaps. But, Chinese baseball? That question was raised by an instructor in a seminar. As a Chinese-American, I had never heard of it. No one else in the class had either. The name of the game apparently originated in Chicago where there are very few Chinese-Americans. The instructor, who is from Chicago, shared this story as an illustration on how to cope with staff communication problems. The gist of the story is that in the baseball game itself, after the white ball is thrown by the pitcher, anyone can kick the bases. That, he said, is the best way to win. The story upset me sufficiently that I could not understand the point. It supposedly illustrated communication. It supposedly was the best way to win; somehow, nobody, therefore, loses in the game.
I was upset because it sounded as if in the game, at the point where everyone kicks bases, there would result all mannter of confusion. Kicking the bases made it seem that Chinese people were people kicked about. Why else call it "Chinese baseball"?
I confronted the instructor during the class break and inquired as to the origin of the phrase. He did not know where or when the term had come into existence, but he did know that it was a game which had been played in the Chicago area for several generations. I told him that I was Chinese and that his statements had insulted me. The instructor asked me not to "take it personally." Probably his ancestors had problems with Chinese people and the naming of the game had racist origins. Having expressed my concern and having been reassured, I still did not feel very goodabout the way it had been done. Still, I assumed that the phrase would not be repeated. To my amazement, the instructor then closed teh seminar by re-using the illustration. I again approached him. And again he was apologetic and said he would have to find another name for it. Will he?
It is clear to me that members of the dominant society often are not sensitive to and remain unconcerned about minorities. They have no sense of the history of ethnic groups in this country. They will not take seriously the comments and feelings of minorities, even when they are specifically todle that their actions are offensive. Do we have to be dramic forever to insure that our point of view and our feelings are taken seriously? Do I have to "knock" the instructor over the head with a bat? Apparently so, for racisim is alive and swinging.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)